Same-sex marriage has been legal in Canada for almost 10 years, so where is the debate headed? References 1. Proponents of marriage typically only talk about the benefits that marriage will bring, but not the penalties. Do not believe in anything simply because it is found written in your religious books.
Published September The Indiana background and resolve read as follows:. Con 1 The institution of marriage has traditionally been defined as being between a man and a woman.
Religious institutions can decline to marry gay and lesbian couples if they wish, but they should not dictate marriage laws for society at large. Find other stories about: Faculty of Lawsame-sex marriageSusan Boyd. The impact of institutional discrimination on psychiatric disorders in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: a prospective study.
Pro 2 Same-sex couples should have access to the same benefits enjoyed by heterosexual married couples. Same-sex marriage trivializes and therefore weakens the institution of heterosexual marriage. Further, lesbian couples often get pregnant with outside help, admittedly, but many heterosexual couples get outside help as well and their families could benefit as well from the legal framework of marriage.
In fact, this is one of the best benefits of same sex marriage. It changes societal infrastructure. These kids need both a father and a mother image to have a balance and normal childhood. Eventually, she feels that her decision was wrong and she gets stressed. The only possibility of neglecting them from planning for a baby or adopting a baby can be done if they are still not married to each other legally.
The recent medical and social science literature cited here assures us that the same holds true for gays and lesbians who are given the opportunity to enter into legal marriage. The Congressional Budget Office estimated on Dec. Though the census is presented as an anonymous data-collection process, those who are suspicious of government or who fear the potential consequences of public acknowledgment of their orientation may not report their orientation correctly, causing incomplete reporting of LGBT prevalence.
Further time and study are clearly warranted in the ongoing assessment of the more widespread implications associated with embracing marriage equality. They have been marginalized, ostracized and abused, and unlike others who have suffered such fates, many of them have not even been able to seek solace and take comfort with members of their own families.