Globerman: Why are 'co-payments' OK for dental care but not health care?

Canadians should ask why the new dental program differs from the way we run our health-care system, and which method is best.

Published Jan 13, 2024 • Last updated 15 hours ago • 2 minute read

Minister of Health Mark Holland announces the new dental care plan on Dec. 11, 2023. Photo by Adrian Wyld /THE CANADIAN PRESS

When assessing the Trudeau government’s new national dental plan, Canadians would be wise to reflect on how it differs — advisedly — from our ailing health-care system.

First, the dental plan is not intended to cover every Canadian — at least, not yet — and instead targets families with household incomes of less than $90,000; children; and uninsured seniors aged 87 and older. Gradually, the plan will cover all other uninsured Canadians, who will become eligible in 2025.

Advertisement 2

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

Exclusive articles from Elizabeth Payne, David Pugliese, Andrew Duffy, Bruce Deachman and others. Plus, food reviews and event listings in the weekly newsletter, Ottawa, Out of Office.Unlimited online access to Ottawa Citizen and 15 news sites with one account.Ottawa Citizen ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.

SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.

Article content

Crucially, the federal plan won’t replace existing provincial and territorial programs that already cover some oral health services (although the provinces have not yet promised to continue funding those provincial programs after the federal plan goes into effect). Eventually, the federal plan is expected to cover up to nine million Canadians. In other words, even when fully implemented, it will only cover one-quarter of the population.

Second, families will contribute “co-payments” to help cover the cost of treatment. Specifically, families with household incomes between $70,000 and $79,999 will pay 40 per cent (out-of-pocket or through private insurance) of the cost of dental services such as cleanings, fillings and root canal treatments, while households in the $80,000 to $89,999 income bracket will pay 60 per cent. Families with household incomes below $70,000 are exempt from co-payments.

This approach stands in stark contrast to our health-care system. The Canada Health Act prohibits patient cost-sharing for services covered by provincial medical insurance plans. This prohibition distinguishes Canada from all other countries that provide universal health care, including countries that consistently outperform Canada on key indicators including wait times.

Advertisement 3

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

In principle, cost-sharing encourages patients to be more prudent in their use of scarce health-care resources than they would be when the government covers all costs (as is the case in Canada). Of course, critics argue that cost-sharing will impose undue financial hardships on low-income families and patients with chronic conditions, which in turn might discourage those patients from accessing health-care services. But in fact, most countries with universal health care use co-payments, which are typically lower for lower-income families and essentially waived for vulnerable populations. It’s therefore curious that the Trudeau government sees wisdom in its co-payment requirement (conditioned on household income) for dental care but not for health care.

Finally, according to the dental plan, dentists will be able to bill the public plan while also treating patients covered by private insurance. Defenders of the health-care status quo in Canada have long argued that this type of “dual billing” will allow private insurers to woo away doctors from the public system and produce a two-tier health-care system that provides better and quicker care for wealthier Canadians.

Advertisement 4

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

While a relevant concern, available evidence from other universal health-care countries suggests that the greater competition and additional investment accompanying a dual billing insurance system actually improves the efficiency of the public system and reduces wait times for all patients.

Federal Health Minister Mark Holland should tell Canadians exactly why co-payments and dual billing are good for his government’s national dental plan yet remain anathema for our foundering health-care system.

Steven Globerman is a senior fellow at the Fraser Institute.

Recommended from Editorial