Female same-sex marriage is practiced among the GikuyuNandiKambaKipsigisand to a lesser extent neighboring peoples. I'd speculate the reasons are partly cultural, partly biological. Thank you for your efforts to bring to light the fiction here and fraud too — perpetrated against all of mankind.
It seems to me that, in order for your system to "work" it needs to somehow distinguish, then, between what is objectively good, across the board, and what is subjectively felt to be good, on an individual level. Richard Dawkins and most atheists obviously know little about religion.
Harry August 26, The audacity of five judges thinking they could define what marriage. We cannot bless what God says is un-blessed. The Portuguese President promulgated the law on 8 April and the law was effective on 5 Junemaking Portugal the eighth country to legalize nationwide same-sex marriage; however, adoption was still denied for same-sex couples.
The main thing I would push you on, though, is the anthropo-centric and hence contingent nature of your theory. Why would anyone legislate against the Church when it's dwindling so quickly without any help?
Furthermore, it would have been impossible to conclude whether the applicants' rights were violated or not unless their claim is accepted and reviewed in a proper manner. Have no idea why. If your religion says X is a sin, but the civil law allows people to do X, then you don't have freedom of religion.
Secularism is to blame.
The idea implicit in the word is that a man took a woman in marriage, in matrimonium ducere , so that he might have children by her. That's why there's sometimes hand-wringing in Catholic families about whether to attend a wedding that violates a core tenet of the faith i. I won't answer the "should" question because that gets into the individual conscience thing.