Canada is a federal country. Oxford Academic. Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. Chile decision inwhich condemned Chile for denying a divorced woman custody of her children because of her sexual orientation.
No provincial head of power extended to the definition of marriage.
The Anglican Church of Canada has been mulling whether to add same-sex marriage to its Marriage Canon for years. Two lesbian couples brought suit on November 4,to have Newfoundland and Labrador recognize same-sex marriage. June 23, Same-sex union legislation Same-sex union court cases Timeline of same-sex marriage Recognition of same-sex unions in Africa Recognition of same-sex unions in Asia Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe Recognition of same-sex unions in the Americas Recognition of same-sex unions in Oceania Marriage privatization Divorce of same-sex couples Domestic partnership Military policy Adoption Listings by country LGBT rights by country or territory.
By Rosemary Bocska. Archived from the original on December 23, Although the couple later settled their differences, the Ontario government appealed the lower court ruling, reported The Globe and Mail. Federal lawyers had ceased to contest such cases,  and only Alberta's Conservative provincial government remained officially opposed.
Canada, D. Its intended affirmation of the autonomy of religious marriages would be provided by the Charter of Rights. Equality and Non-Discrimination. In the Little Sisters case13 a practice by customs officials was held to breach section
But the Charter of Rights holds the answer to that concern. As related earlier, Parliament did end up playing a role in the final outcome. Does the freedom of religion guaranteed by paragraph 2 a of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms protect religious officials from being compelled to perform a marriage between two persons of the same sex that is contrary to their religious beliefs?
Minor correction to your post — Carlos Alvarado Quesado strongly supported the ruling and the election was indeed polarized around the issue. The attorney general of Canada who represents the government of Canada in court was a party to the litigation in the three provinces and had taken the position that the traditional definition of marriage which was current at that point in federal law was constitutional.
Equality and Non-Discrimination.