Baltimore’s Surveillance Oversight Bill Faces Unexpected Roadblock: What It Means for Privacy

Proposed bill that would put closer eye on Baltimore's surveillance technology hits roadblock

BALTIMORE — A recently proposed‍ city commission aimed at enhancing oversight of Baltimore’s surveillance systems faced a significant setback⁤ on Wednesday when a ‌committee within the city council appeared to thwart its progress.

This legislation, which has ‌been in development for over a year, intended ⁣to establish the Community Advisory Commission on Surveillance. The proposal was discussed during ⁢hearings held by⁣ the Public Safety and Government Operations ⁣Committee on Wednesday.

The bill’s advocate, Councilman Kristerfer Burnett from⁣ District ‌8, expressed the need for increased scrutiny over how surveillance technologies are employed‌ throughout ⁣the city.

“As my final initiative as part of ⁣this legislative body,” Burnett ⁣stated. “[This bill aims to] establish a framework that will allow both citizens and government officials to comprehend ‍better how these technologies affect everyday lives.”

Aims of the Proposed ​Community Advisory ‌Commission

The envisioned commission would comprise eleven individuals representing diverse fields such as urban governance, ⁤civil liberties advocacy, police oversight, technological expertise, and ethical considerations.

Collectively, this assembly would set forth ​guidelines governing the application of surveillance technologies in Baltimore.

Apprehensions Regarding the Legislation

One officer pointed out that critical forensic aspects of surveillance usage were not addressed by the bill.

“We are also‍ worried about being ⁣mandated to gather demographic information on every individual identified through our operations,” one representative articulated. “Forensics is responsible for ensuring that such data is properly managed.”

Addressing Concerns Through Amendments

“The committee⁢ has decided against ‌backing what our constituents desire regarding stronger protections against potential violations of their civil rights,” he⁢ stated.

.

Exit mobile version