The series’ lowest point despite its attractive visuals? Currently, review platforms like Metacritic are being bombarded with negative comments about the new Call of Duty iteration. Aside from the game’s scope (DLC content for the price of a full game) being criticized, people also aren’t saying the best things about its campaign (missions, story, etc). We have primarily taken a closer look at this new release’s tech.
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Daisy Dickson), Published 11/14/2023 🇩🇪
We currently carry out our gaming benchmarks using these devices. Clicking on the photos will take you to the respective manufacturer’s website. More details on the specifications are listed at the end of the article.
Before even being able to play any of the game, you are confronted by a number of (to put it cautiously) waiting times — as is typical for Call of Duty or Activision. Beginning with the fact that the game takes up over 100 GB of storage, which is a lot for a shooter or a video game in general. This means you’ll need to have a certain amount of patience — even if you have a speedy internet connection.
As soon as you have entered into the game, you also have to wait a good few minutes for the shaders to be loaded (the weaker the GPU the longer this will take). Furthermore, the game requires a restart in certain cases (even if you want to switch to single-player mode). This is also quite annoying. Adding to this is the fact that it sometimes takes unnecessarily long to log in and even the Steam version requires an Activision account.
When it comes to settings options, we have a lot less to criticize about the game. After years of critique surrounding its missing presets, the developers have finally installed some since the new edition of Modern Warfare 2, now giving you a gigantic amount of quality options to choose from. They can be adjusted in one fell swoop — although, it is a little strange that there isn’t a High preset and instead, Balanced is immediately followed by Ultra.
Apart from that, Modern Warfare 3 does almost everything right. Aside from text descriptions, some options even include handy comparison images, as we primarily know from Ubisoft games (e.g. The Crew Motorfest). The effects on CPU, GPU and VRAM are also sometimes included. Speaking of video memory: A VRAM display is permanently shown on the graphics menu. In general, the game benefits from a lot of modern features. At the forefront stands upscaling in the shape of XeSS (Intel), FSR (AMD) and DLSS (Nvidia). It is also nice to see that most changes don’t require you to restart the game.
The developers also deserve praise for the game’s integrated benchmark. However, it can’t be found in the graphics menu — instead, it is hidden within “Private Match”, which is quite unfitting. The speed measurement first shows the camera gliding through fog, followed by a first-person view of a character running through outdoor and indoor surroundings with lots of action and effects (smoke, explosions, etc). This lasts for about a minute and is quite demanding of the graphics card.
Positive: During the measurement, the FPS number is shown. At the end of the benchmark, an in-depth analysis is displayed including system specs, CPU/GPU FPS and (V)RAM load. The second tab even shows the performance split into different zones. We have previously only seen such detailed information on the PC version of Returnal.
Modern Warfare 3 looks quite good in total, which couldn’t be said for every part of the series on release day. In relation to the offered graphics, the game’s requirements are moderate. Using the current best laptop iGPU, the Radeon 780M, you can play the game at 1,920 x 1,080 pixels with low to medium settings. Mid-range graphics cards such as the GeForce RTX 4050 manage to run the game in Full HD and with maximum details.
1920×1080 Basic Preset 1920×1080 Balanced Preset 1920×1080 Ultra Preset 1920×1080 Extreme Preset AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
273 (139min) fps ∼100%
242 (137min) fps ∼100%
234 (133min) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
263 (201min) fps ∼96%
214 (163min) fps ∼88%
202 (161min) fps ∼86%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Neo 17 E23
232 (154min) fps ∼85%
198 (144min) fps ∼82%
187 (136min) fps ∼80%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
193 (101min) fps ∼71%
167 (90min) fps ∼69%
161 (92min) fps ∼69%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX
148 (113min) fps ∼54%
117 (86min) fps ∼48%
110 (81min) fps ∼47%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Pro 15 E23
156 (109min) fps ∼57%
119 (88min) fps ∼49%
108 (80min) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
133 (91min) fps ∼49%
99 (74min) fps ∼41%
91 (69min) fps ∼39%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16
137 (98min) fps ∼50%
99 (70min) fps ∼41%
89 (65min) fps ∼38%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H
Medion Erazer Scout E20
118 (74min) fps ∼43%
85 (58min) fps ∼35%
80 (50min) fps ∼34%
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16
56 (43min) fps ∼100%
50 (38min) fps ∼18%
36 (27min) fps ∼15%
31 (24min) fps ∼13%
You also don’t necessarily need a high-end chip for QHD displays. A Radeon RX 7600S or a GeForce RTX 4060 already manages to hit the 60 FPS mark when running the game at 2,560 x 1,440 pixels and using the preset Extreme.
2560×1440 Extreme Preset AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
184 (129min) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
151 (116min) fps ∼82%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Neo 17 E23
142 (98min) fps ∼77%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
121 (79min) fps ∼66%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX
81 (54min) fps ∼44%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Pro 15 E23
78 (53min) fps ∼42%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
66 (49min) fps ∼36%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16
58 (16min) fps ∼32%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H
Medion Erazer Scout E20
53 (15min) fps ∼29%
You only need a true gaming device when playing Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 on 4K monitors with higher settings. Without DLSS, we would recommend at least a GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and with DLSS (which, at least in the quality setting, hardly improves the performance), we would recommend a GeForce RTX 4070 or better.
3840×2160 Extreme Preset 3840×2160 Extreme Preset + Quality DLSS AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
118 (87min) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
94 (68min) fps ∼80%
130 (109min) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Neo 17 E23
93 (66min) fps ∼79%
101 (73min) fps ∼78%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
77 (51min) fps ∼65%
87 (57min) fps ∼67%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX
54 (37min) fps ∼46%
60 (44min) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Pro 15 E23
48 (35min) fps ∼41%
55 (42min) fps ∼42%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
40 (27min) fps ∼34%
46 (35min) fps ∼35%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16
34 (24min) fps ∼29%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H
Medion Erazer Scout E20
32 (21min) fps ∼27%
37 (28min) fps ∼28%
(-) * Smaller values are better. / n123 Number of benchmarks for this median value / * Approximate position
Legend5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fpsMay Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps60Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fpsMay Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.?Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.
Cns
Laptop
Graphics card
Processor
RAM
XMG Neo 17 E23
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @175 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6X)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 @175 W TGP (12 GB GDDR6X)
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Pro 15 E23
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2 x 8 GB DDR5
Medion Erazer Scout E20
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 @100 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6)
Intel Core i7-13700H
2 x 8 GB DDR5
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti @150 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6)
Intel Core i9-12900H
2 x 16 GB DDR5
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16
AMD Radeon RX 7600S (8 GB GDDR6) & AMD Radeon 780M
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2 x 8 GB DDR5
Tower PC
Graphics card
Processor
RAM
Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 (16 GB GDDR6X)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB GDDR6)
Intel Core i9-13900K
2 x 24 GB DDR5 G.Skill
Operating system
Nvidia driver
AMD driver
Windows 11
ForceWare 546.01
Adrenalin 23.11.1
Editor of the original article: Florian Glaser – Managing Editor Gaming Laptops – 592 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2009
I discovered my interest in computers in my childhood, growing up with MS-DOS and Windows 3.1 in the early 1990s. I was especially fascinated with computer games, even from an early age. From Monkey Island through Lands of Lore to Doom, I tried every game I could get my hands on. I have been working for Notebookcheck since 2009 with my focus mostly being on high-performance gaming laptops.
Translator: Daisy Dickson – Translator – 127 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023
Originally from Scotland, I grew up and lived in Germany until I completed my high school qualifications before moving back to Scotland to complete my university studies. Growing up bilingual led me to form a close relationship with the English and German languages, often working in the fields of teaching and translation. Most of my childhood was shaped by playing around on new consoles, computers and gadgets and getting to grips with the new craze of the internet and smartphones. This interest has stayed with me well into adulthood. Nowadays, I live in Glasgow and work as a freelance translator and digital media coordinator. I have been translating for Notebookcheck since early 2023.
Florian Glaser, 2023-11-14 (Update: 2023-11-14)
>>> Read full article>>>
Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source : NotebookCheck – https://www.notebookcheck.net/Call-of-Duty-Modern-Warfare-3-2023-review-Laptop-and-desktop-benchmarks.767754.0.html