Regina Public said the procedure in question was created with extensive consultation and “in good faith” with staff, students and parents.
Published Oct 17, 2023 • Last updated 9 hours ago • 3 minute read
Minister of Education Jeremy Cockrill answers questions from the press after Question Period at the Saskatchewan Legislative Building on Thursday, October 12, 2023 in Regina. Photo by KAYLE NEIS /Regina Leader-Post
Education minister Jeremy Cockrill says a specific procedure active in Regina Public School Division was the spark that ignited government’s interest to introduce a province-wide parental inclusion policy over students’ pronouns.
On the floor of the legislature Monday, and again following session, Cockrill said an administrative directive in the Regina school division on sharing a student’s preferred pronouns prompted concern, because it “excluded” parents from conversations about students’ changing gender identity.
Advertisement 2
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.Get exclusive access to the Regina Leader-Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.Get exclusive access to the Regina Leader-Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
REGISTER TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.
Article content
Article content
“When you have one school division that comes forward and is explicitly excluding parents in reporting discussions involving their children,” he said, “when we talk about the impetus for Bill 137, that really was the impetus.”
Related Stories
Child’s rights ‘must always take precedence,’ says Sask. Human Rights commissioner after resignation
Rally outside Legislative Building opposes pronoun policy as MLAs recalled
Moe vows to use notwithstanding clause after court injunction halts pronoun policy
Available openly on Regina Public’s website, the Students and Gender and Sexual Diversity procedure is presented as an administrative procedure that guides operations on a division level, to “define appropriate behaviours and actions in order to prevent harassment and discrimination” of students over sexual orientation or gender identity.
It says that “every student has the right to be addressed by a name or pronoun that corresponds to their gender identity,” and that staff are to “respect confidentiality and privacy and not disclose sexual orientation, gender identity, and/or gender expression of students unless the student has given permission or there is an impending safety concern.”
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Article content
Advertisement 3
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
When pressed by reporters Monday, Cockrill said he considers parental exclusion “would be the operational implication” of that directive.
“The way that I read that policy, that Regina Public has, it started from the default position of excluding,” he said.
“We believe that parents have an important role to play in those conversations, and so when they’re excluded, explicitly or implicitly, then that’s something that we need to correct.”
Both Cockrill and predecessor Dustin Duncan have previously said the catalyst for government’s pronoun consent policy was correspondence from parents and constituents to MLAs, as has Premier Scott Moe.
Moe backed his minister Tuesday, saying Regina Public’s procedure is “one of the precipitous that would have spurred a number of parents to start reaching out to their elected members,” before referencing recent outcry after a sexual health education mis-step in Lumsden as another.
“We have a school division that has changed from what has traditionally been the policy in our schools in the province,” Moe said.
He called Bill 137 the way in which government is “returning us to status quo, regardless of where you live.”
Advertisement 4
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
“There’s very much people on both sides of this conversation,” said. “With respect to government, we are listening to all people and moving in the direction of what our parents are asking us to do.”
Regina Public Schools declined interview requests on Tuesday, but provided a written statement via email.
The division asserts that the administrative procedure is not new, but was added in June of 2022 on recommendation of a special committee on diversity formed in 2019.
“The school division has shared values which speak to respect, belonging and responsibility and this Administrative Procedure honours those values,” reads Regina Public’s statement.
“We always have and always will work with parents, families and caregivers to keep them informed and ensure student well-being.”
Spokesperson Terry Lazarou said that division administration developed the procedure “in good faith” with stakeholders, students and parents, after lengthy consultation.
Regina Public said it has “never had a complaint or criticism of how the school division promotes student safety and protection in schools from any of the families of more than 26,000 students.”
Advertisement 5
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
“Further, we have never had an inquiry from the Minister about this procedure,” reads the statement.
Regina Public did not offer comment on the education minister’s accusations of exclusion, but Lazarou said inclusivity is a priority within the division.
Members of the 2019 special committee became an internal steering committee for Regina Public in 2021, indicating an ongoing importance in promoting inclusion. That committee still operates internally.
“Diversity is an evolving process, understanding it and applying it,” said Lazarou. “We’re constantly working with our employees and our students on their needs, and on understanding change on a variety of issues relating to inclusiveness.”
With a new strategic plan for the division to be presented Tuesday evening, Lazarou said “inclusion is very much part of any plans we have going forward.”
— with files from Alec Salloum
With some online platforms blocking access to the news upon which you depend, our website is your destination for up-to-the-minute news, so make sure to bookmark leaderpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here so we can keep you informed.
Article content
>>> Read full article>>>
Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source : Leader Post – https://leaderpost.com/news/local-news/sask-politics/sask-education-minister-says-regina-public-policy-impetus-for-pronoun-bill
