European universities and research institutions helped to pioneer the development of key technologies for the genetic engineering of crops1. Despite its early leading role, Europe has largely resisted the use of modern genetic technologies in agriculture. The combined implementation of an unofficial moratorium on the cultivation and import of transgenic genetically modified organisms (GMOs) (1998–2004) and a strict approval process for transgenic GMOs established by a 2001 European Union (EU) directive2 has severely constrained innovation by both the public and private sectors in the past decades. The hurdle of restrictive GMO regulation created a situation in which many larger corporations and enterprises have relocated their R&D efforts to places and markets more open to technological innovations. At the same time, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and public research institutions had little prospect of seeing their GMO research reach the field. This discouraged translational and applied research in this area and also prevented the rigorous testing of scientific hypotheses with field experiments.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
24,99 € / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
209,00 € per year
only 17,42 € per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Additional access options:
Log in
Learn about institutional subscriptions
Read our FAQs
Contact customer support
References
Somssich, M. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.7287/PEERJ.PREPRINTS.27556V2 (2019).
European Commission. Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC – Commission Declaration. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32001L0018 (2001).
Chen, K., Wang, Y., Zhang, R., Zhang, H. & Gao, C. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.70, 667–697 (2019).
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Purnhagen, K. P. et al. Nat. Biotechnol.36, 573–575 (2018).
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Court of Justice of the European Union. Press release 111/18, https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2018-07/cp180111en.pdf (25 July 2018).
Phillips, P. W. B. & Williams, A. A meta-analysis of GM crops regulatory approval costs. https://www.schoolofpublicpolicy.sk.ca/csip/documents/research-paper-summaries/2023_a-meta-analysis-of-gm-crops-regulatory-approval-costs.pdf.pdf (Johnson-Shoyama Centre for the Study of Science and Innovation Policy, 2022).
Whelan, A. I., Gutti, P. & Lema, M. A. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.8, 525237 (2020).
Article
Google Scholar
Smyth, S. J. Food Energy Secur.6, 78–86 (2017).
Article
Google Scholar
EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO). EFSA J https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2943 (2012).
European Commission. Commission recommendation of 13 July 2010 on guidelines for the development of national co-existence measures to avoid the unintended presence of GMOs in conventional and organic crops. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2010:200:0001:0005:EN:PDF (2010).
Schütte, G. et al. Environ. Sci. Eur.29, 5 (2017).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Colbach, N. & Cordeau, S. Front. Agron.4, 823069 (2022).
Article
Google Scholar
Löbmann, A., Christen, O. & Petersen, J. Weed Res.59, 479–489 (2019).
Article
Google Scholar
European Commission. Herbicide resistant rice development for European Continental Project | HerbaRice | Fact sheet | Horizon 2020. CORDIS https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/897192 (2020).
Cao, J. et al. Nat. Genet.43, 956–963 (2011).
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Agriculture and Fisheries Council. Public session PM. https://video.consilium.europa.eu/event/en/26992 (2023).
Irandu, E. M. GeoJournal84, 877–887 (2019).
Article
Google Scholar
Jayne, T. S. et al. Agric. Econ.50, 75–95 (2019).
Article
Google Scholar
Glass-O’Shea, B. J. Food Law Policy7, 3 (2011).
Google Scholar
Shumbe, L., Soares, E., Muhovski, Y., Smit, I. & Vanderschuren, H. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.18.549223 (2023).
Download references
Acknowledgements
P.C. and D.W. are funded by the Max Planck Society. D.M. is supported by the KU Leuven Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Crop Biotechnics, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Hervé Vanderschuren & Devang Mehta
KU Leuven Plant Institute (LPI), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Hervé Vanderschuren & Devang Mehta
TERRA Teaching and Research Center, University of Liège, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Gembloux, Belgium
Hervé Vanderschuren
Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
Patience Chatukuta & Detlef Weigel
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
D.W. holds equity in Computomics, which advises plant breeders. D.W. also consults for KWS SE, a plant breeder and seed producer with activities throughout the world. All other authors declare no competing interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Vanderschuren, H., Chatukuta, P., Weigel, D. et al. A new chance for genome editing in Europe.
Nat Biotechnol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01969-4
Download citation
Published: 14 September 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01969-4
>>> Read full article>>>
Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source : Nature.com – https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-023-01969-4