A new chance for genome editing in Europe

European universities and research institutions helped to pioneer the development of key technologies for the genetic engineering of crops1. Despite its early leading role, Europe has largely resisted the use of modern genetic technologies in agriculture. The combined implementation of an unofficial moratorium on the cultivation and import of transgenic genetically modified organisms (GMOs) (1998–2004) and a strict approval process for transgenic GMOs established by a 2001 European Union (EU) directive2 has severely constrained innovation by both the public and private sectors in the past decades. The hurdle of restrictive GMO regulation created a situation in which many larger corporations and enterprises have relocated their R&D efforts to places and markets more open to technological innovations. At the same time, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and public research institutions had little prospect of seeing their GMO research reach the field. This discouraged translational and applied research in this area and also prevented the rigorous testing of scientific hypotheses with field experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

24,99 € / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

209,00 € per year

only 17,42 € per issue

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Read our FAQs

Contact customer support

References

Somssich, M. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.7287/PEERJ.PREPRINTS.27556V2 (2019).

European Commission. Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC – Commission Declaration. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32001L0018 (2001).

Chen, K., Wang, Y., Zhang, R., Zhang, H. & Gao, C. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 70, 667–697 (2019).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar

Purnhagen, K. P. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 573–575 (2018).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar

Court of Justice of the European Union. Press release 111/18, https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2018-07/cp180111en.pdf (25 July 2018).

Phillips, P. W. B. & Williams, A. A meta-analysis of GM crops regulatory approval costs. https://www.schoolofpublicpolicy.sk.ca/csip/documents/research-paper-summaries/2023_a-meta-analysis-of-gm-crops-regulatory-approval-costs.pdf.pdf (Johnson-Shoyama Centre for the Study of Science and Innovation Policy, 2022).

Whelan, A. I., Gutti, P. & Lema, M. A. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 525237 (2020).

Article

Google Scholar

Smyth, S. J. Food Energy Secur. 6, 78–86 (2017).

Article

Google Scholar

EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO). EFSA J https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2943 (2012).

European Commission. Commission recommendation of 13 July 2010 on guidelines for the development of national co-existence measures to avoid the unintended presence of GMOs in conventional and organic crops. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2010:200:0001:0005:EN:PDF (2010).

Schütte, G. et al. Environ. Sci. Eur. 29, 5 (2017).

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar

Colbach, N. & Cordeau, S. Front. Agron. 4, 823069 (2022).

Article

Google Scholar

Löbmann, A., Christen, O. & Petersen, J. Weed Res. 59, 479–489 (2019).

Article

Google Scholar

European Commission. Herbicide resistant rice development for European Continental Project | HerbaRice | Fact sheet | Horizon 2020. CORDIS https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/897192 (2020).

Cao, J. et al. Nat. Genet. 43, 956–963 (2011).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar

Agriculture and Fisheries Council. Public session PM. https://video.consilium.europa.eu/event/en/26992 (2023).

Irandu, E. M. GeoJournal 84, 877–887 (2019).

Article

Google Scholar

Jayne, T. S. et al. Agric. Econ. 50, 75–95 (2019).

Article

Google Scholar

Glass-O’Shea, B. J. Food Law Policy 7, 3 (2011).

Google Scholar

Shumbe, L., Soares, E., Muhovski, Y., Smit, I. & Vanderschuren, H. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.18.549223 (2023).

Download references

Acknowledgements

P.C. and D.W. are funded by the Max Planck Society. D.M. is supported by the KU Leuven Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Crop Biotechnics, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Hervé Vanderschuren & Devang Mehta

KU Leuven Plant Institute (LPI), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Hervé Vanderschuren & Devang Mehta

TERRA Teaching and Research Center, University of Liège, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Gembloux, Belgium

Hervé Vanderschuren

Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

Patience Chatukuta & Detlef Weigel

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to
Hervé Vanderschuren, Patience Chatukuta, Detlef Weigel or Devang Mehta.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

D.W. holds equity in Computomics, which advises plant breeders. D.W. also consults for KWS SE, a plant breeder and seed producer with activities throughout the world. All other authors declare no competing interests.

About this article

Cite this article

Vanderschuren, H., Chatukuta, P., Weigel, D. et al. A new chance for genome editing in Europe.
Nat Biotechnol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01969-4

Download citation

Published: 14 September 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01969-4

>>> Read full article>>>
Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source : Nature.com – https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-023-01969-4